You know, I have grown quite tired of you calling me that. [Surely this will only encourage Spike! Anyway.]
Mr Okumura is clearly someone who intentionally led us to have an incorrect impression of him. Why he did this we cannot say, and at this point it matters little. If things had... gone differently, I would have liked to discuss the matter with him regardless of his guilt in this case, if only to ascertain whether he potentially held a threat going forward.
But as miss Mikotoba says, she did share her reasoning with me. I believe it to be sound. While I still do not think we can conclusively rule Mr Okumura out, I believe at this point it is a much better use of our time to consider other suspects.
If we take the narrowed-down footprint results at face value; that leaves us with Mr Kaburagi, Mr Yoo, Mr Turner, and myself.
However there is also the question of the.... note that was left, which was apparently the most important piece of evidence. [HE IS TIRED.]
And Mr. Turner was ruled out by Mr. Yuri's quick thinking, if you recall. But I admit, I feel some distrust towards that footprint as evidence. It feels . . . [Hmm.] Everything was staged carefully, wasn't it? There was time to seal me in that room. Yet this meticulous killer tipped over some ashes, stepped in them, and failed to clean it up?
[It doesn't really sit right with her.]
. . . Yes, the message. If I recall correctly, it was scratched into the floor?
You may have a point. But even so, I . . . I would not feel comfortable narrowing our search that way. [. . .] You know . . . there was a story once in Randst Magazine where the detective catches a culprit by scattering cigarette ash on the floor and capturing the villain's footprints when he later crept through the darkened room. I always thought - my apologies to Iris - it was a little silly. Even in the dark, wouldn't one notice the crunch of ash beneath one's feet?
I cannot say. But you may be right. I simply felt we should take all potential factors of the situation into consideration.
But when I had asked Spike his reasoning, he did not only cite his interpretation of Mr Okumura's character, but of the others as well. He claimed we would all have been "more direct." I do agree that it would be odd for someone of Mr Yoo's physical ability to resort to such an indirect means of murder, myself included.
Yes, I don't think so either. And. . . furthermore, though it may not be evidence suited for a court of law, I know you would not have done such a thing to me, Lord van Zieks. There is no doubt in my mind about that. That would leave only Mr. Yoo Joonghyuk and Mr. Kaburagi, and neither feels right to me.
If we put aside the shoeprint for just a while, maybe something else will catch our attention.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
[Surely this will only encourage Spike! Anyway.]
Mr Okumura is clearly someone who intentionally led us to have an incorrect impression of him. Why he did this we cannot say, and at this point it matters little. If things had... gone differently, I would have liked to discuss the matter with him regardless of his guilt in this case, if only to ascertain whether he potentially held a threat going forward.
But as miss Mikotoba says, she did share her reasoning with me. I believe it to be sound. While I still do not think we can conclusively rule Mr Okumura out, I believe at this point it is a much better use of our time to consider other suspects.
If we take the narrowed-down footprint results at face value; that leaves us with Mr Kaburagi, Mr Yoo, Mr Turner, and myself.
However there is also the question of the.... note that was left, which was apparently the most important piece of evidence.
[HE IS TIRED.]
no subject
[It doesn't really sit right with her.]
. . . Yes, the message. If I recall correctly, it was scratched into the floor?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Like the fact that you're a bitch.]
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
[Hmm.]
You may have a point. But even so, I . . . I would not feel comfortable narrowing our search that way. [. . .] You know . . . there was a story once in Randst Magazine where the detective catches a culprit by scattering cigarette ash on the floor and capturing the villain's footprints when he later crept through the darkened room. I always thought - my apologies to Iris - it was a little silly. Even in the dark, wouldn't one notice the crunch of ash beneath one's feet?
I could be entirely mistaken.
no subject
But when I had asked Spike his reasoning, he did not only cite his interpretation of Mr Okumura's character, but of the others as well. He claimed we would all have been "more direct." I do agree that it would be odd for someone of Mr Yoo's physical ability to resort to such an indirect means of murder, myself included.
no subject
Yes, I don't think so either. And. . . furthermore, though it may not be evidence suited for a court of law, I know you would not have done such a thing to me, Lord van Zieks. There is no doubt in my mind about that. That would leave only Mr. Yoo Joonghyuk and Mr. Kaburagi, and neither feels right to me.
If we put aside the shoeprint for just a while, maybe something else will catch our attention.